![]() And he gives UAD forum members an additional 11% discount with the code word FORUM. Sometimes "Uncle Eric" at has it on sale too. Eventide usually repeats that sale during the holidays. Interestingly, though it's not a UA plug-in, I've found the noise Gate in the Eventide UltraChannel plug-in has some of the cleanest sound I used on voice-over, which is essentially what podcasting is.Ī couple months ago the Eventide UltraChannel was on sale for $50 instead of its regular $250. SSL 4000E Channel Strip - uses $41% of a DSP chipīut the SSL Legacy only uses 7% of a DSP chip Neve 88RS Cannel Strip - uses 22% of a DSP chipĪPI Vision Channel Strip - uses 31% of a DSP chip Project title: Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support Software for Guiding Acute Stroke Therapy. But three of their channel strips do, and include a noise gate. It turns out Ua doesn't offer a stand-alone gate plug-in. BA (Before Apollo) I was using a Drawmer DS201 hardware noise gate, and had to feed it with a hardware mic pre. I had the same question when I first bought n Apollo, and called customer support to ask about a noise gate. This would greatly reduce the amount of post production work.Ĭan someone point me in the right direction? Also, if there are other suggestions that would assist in making the podcast setup simple and sound good, I am all ears For the life of me, I can't find a noise gate plugging which will only allow a microphone to activate should a person break a certain threshold. I was told by someone more experienced that I that I should be able to set up a noise gate and compressor. The sound is really good, I am able to isolate each speaker into a different track in adobe audition, but I have found that editing the podcast can be tedious as the other microphones at the podcast table pick up a bit of audio from the person talking and it can make it sound echoy (is that a word.?). I am recording a podcast, and after having tried a few less than optimal setups I buckled to the internet advice and have a setup using Shure SM7b microphones attached to cloud lifters and then into an Apollo x8. I got this from an incredible resource I just found: the Lunar Module Operations Handbook, 800 pages of Apollo-y goodness.As I am a newb, I think I have a very simple question that hopefully someone can assist with. ![]() That, in fact, seems to have been a buzzer, although not through a loudspeaker:Ī malfunction also activates a 3-kc signal that providesĪ tone in the astronaut headsets and supplies the PCMTEA with a telemetry signal. ![]() Very neat!Įdit3: The above information related to the Command Module C&W system, my error, since the question is really about the Lunar Module C&W system. So roughly similar (alternating) but not the same.Įdit2: Russell Borogove synthesized 5 seconds of each alarm at this link. It is indeed kind of a warbling sound that to me sounds like a French police car (at least as they are portrayed in American movies).Įdit: just found the Shuttle spec, and it's 400 Hz for. If the Shuttle copied this sound for its master alarm (likely), I've heard that one a bunch. Take control of your data from anywhere with the Apollo Cloud Series NAS devices. Perhaps someone can gen that up? It appears to me to be more like an alternating type sound rather than a buzzer. The Apollo Operations Handbook, Caution and Warning section, identifies the alarm tone as "a square wave that is alternately 750 cps and 2000 cps, changing at a rate of 2.5 times a second" Is that reasonably accurate? Would that buzzer have gone off during the 12 alarms during the Apollo 11 landing? The film Apollo 13 portrays the master alarm as a red light with a loud repeating buzzer. In November 1968, NASA engineer Bill Tindall wrote a delightful memo recommending against tying a low fuel warning to the master alarm precisely because it was an expected occurrence: "just at the most critical time in the most critical operation of a perfectly nominal lunar landing mission, the master alarm with all its lights, bells, and whistles will go off." In actuality the 12 errors were not extremely serious, though the uncertainty of their cause at the time was a big concern. This was connected to the master alarm system to get the crew's attention the alarms distracted the crew and may have contributed to the long hover time and marginal fuel state on that landing. During the Apollo 11 landing, a misconfiguration caused the guidance computer to activate the 12 program alarms, signifying that the computer was overloaded and dropping low-priority tasks. /rebates/&.com252fShowUserReviews-g60864-d5487608-r223923090-Bamboulas-NewOrleansLouisiana.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |